Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Estudio comparativo de la remoción de materia orgánica en humedales construidos de flujo horizontal subsuperficial usando tres especies de macrófitas

dc.contributor.authorMontoya Restrepo, Jorge Ignacio
dc.contributor.authorCeballos Urrego, Leonardo
dc.contributor.authorCasas Zapata, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.authorMorató Farreras, Jordi
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-19T23:13:53Z
dc.date.available2023-09-19T23:13:53Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1794-1237spa
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.tdea.edu.co/handle/tdea/3868
dc.description.abstractLos humedales construidos se presentan actualmente como una tecnología prometedora en reducir la contaminación por aguas residuales; este estudio investigó la remoción de materia orgánica con agua residual sintética, en términos de demanda química de oxígeno (DQO), demanda biológica de oxígeno (DBO5) y medi-ciones in situ de pH, oxígeno y temperatura cada 15 días, durante 3 meses, en seis sistemas de humedales cons-truidos de flujo subsuperficial horizontal, a escala piloto, sembrados con tres diferentes macrófitas: Canna limbata, Heliconia psittacorum y Phragmites sp; las remociones medias de DQO fueron de 97,31 % y 95,94 % para Canna limbata; 94,49 % y 93,50 %para Heliconia psittacorum; 97,39 % y 97,13 % para Phragmites sp. En DBO5 fueron de 100 % y 99,36 % para Canna limbata; 99,09 % y 97,49 %para Heliconia psittacorum; 100 % y 99,45 %para Phrag-mites sp. Se concluye que existen diferencias significativas para la remoción de DQO entre las diferentes plantas (P < 0,05); en la remoción de la DBO5 no existen estadísticamente diferencias significativas entre las diferentes plantas (P < 0,05). Este estudio demuestra la opción de reducir la contaminación por materia orgánica utilizando hume-dales construidos.PALABRAS CLAVE: demanda química de oxígeno; demanda bioquímica de oxígeno; agua residual; humedal construido; macrófitas; materia orgánica
dc.description.abstractConstructed wetlands appear at the present time like a promising technology in reducing the pollution by waste waters; this study investigated the organic matter removal with synthetic waste water, in terms of chemical oxygen demand (COD), biological oxygen demand (BOD5) and in situ measurements of pH, oxygen and temperature every 15 days, during three months, in six horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland systems, in pilot scale, seeded with three different macrophytes: Canna limbata, Heliconia psittacorum and Phragmites sp; the average removals of COD were of 97,31 % and 95,94 % for Canna limbata; 94,49 % and 93,50 % for Heliconia psittacorum;97,39 % and 97,13 % for Phragmites sp. In BOD they were of 100 % and 99,36 % for Canna limbata; 99,09 % and 97,49 % for Heliconia psittacorum; 100 % and 99,45 % for Phragmites sp. We conclude that there are significant differences in DQO removal between different plants (P < 0,05); in BOD5 removal significant differences between the different plants do not exist statistically (P < 0,05). This study demonstrates the option to reduce the polution from organic matter using constructed wetlands.KEY WORDS: chemical oxygen demand; biochemical oxygen demand; wastewater; constructed wetland; macrophytes; organic matter.
dc.description.abstractOs banhados construídos são agora uma tecnologia promissora para reduzir a poluição por esgotos; este estudo investigou a remoção de matéria orgânica com esgoto sintético, em termos de demanda química de oxigênio (DQO), demanda biológica de oxigênio (DBO5) e medições in situ de pH, oxigênio e temperatura a cada 15 dias durante 3 meses, em seis sistemas de banhados construídos de fluxo sub-superficial horizontal, em escala piloto plantados com três diferentes macrófitas: Canna limbata, Heliconia psittacorum e Phragmites sp; as remoçães médias de DQO média foram 97,31 % e 95,94 % para Canna limbata, 94,49 % e 93,50 % para Heliconia psittacorum; 97,39 % e 97,13 % para Phragmites sp. Em DBO5 foram de 100 % e 99,36 % para Canna limbata, 99,09 % e 97,49 % para Heliconia psittacorum; 100 % e 99,45 % para Phragmitessp. Conclui-se que existem diferenças significativas para a remoção de DQO entre plantas diferentes (P <0,05); na remoção de DBO5 não existem diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre plantas diferentes (P <0,05). Este estudo demonstra a possibilidade de reduzir a poluição por matéria orgânica utilizando banhados construídos. PALAVRAS-CÓDIGO: demanda química de oxigênio, demanda bioquímica de oxigênio; esgotos; banhado construído; macrófitas; matéria orgânica
dc.format.extent10 páginasspa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfspa
dc.language.isospaspa
dc.publisherEscuela de Ingeniería de Antioquiaspa
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/spa
dc.sourcehttps://revistas.eia.edu.co/index.php/reveia/article/view/420spa
dc.subject.otherDemanda química de oxígeno
dc.subject.otherChemical oxygen demand
dc.subject.otherDemanda química de oxigênio
dc.subject.otherBiochemical oxygen demand
dc.titleEstudio comparativo de la remoción de materia orgánica en humedales construidos de flujo horizontal subsuperficial usando tres especies de macrófitas
dc.typeArtículo de revistaspa
dc.rights.licenseAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)spa
dc.publisher.placeColombiaspa
dc.relation.citationendpage84spa
dc.relation.citationissue14spa
dc.relation.citationstartpage75spa
dc.relation.citationvolume7spa
dc.relation.ispartofjournalRevista EIAspa
dc.relation.referencesAguirre, P. (2004). Mecanismos de eliminación de la materia orgánica y de los nutrientes en humedales construidos de flujo subsuperficial, pp. 17-29. En: García,J.; Morató, J. y Bayona, J. M. Nuevos criterios para el diseño y operación de humedales construidos. Una alternativa de bajo coste para el tratamiento de aguas residuales. Barcelona: CPET y UPC, 2004. 100 pspa
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong W.; Armstrong, J. and Beckett, P. M. (1990). Measuring and modelling of oxygen release from roots of Phragmites australis.In: Constructed wetlands in water pollution control, Cooper P. F. and Findlater B. C. (eds,)spa
dc.relation.referencesAxler, R.; Henneck, J. and McCarthy, B. (2001). “Residential subsurface flow treatment wetlands in northern Min-nesota”. Water Science and Technology, vol. 44, No. 11-12, pp. 345-352.spa
dc.relation.referencesAyaz, S. C. and Akca, L. (2001). “Treatment of wastewater by natural systems”. Environment International, vol. 26, No. 3 (Jaunuary), pp. 189-195spa
dc.relation.referencesBarrett, E. C.; Sobsey, M. D.; House, C. H. and White, K. D. (2001). “Microbial indicator removal in onsite constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Southeastern US”. Water Science and Technology, vol. 44, No. 11-12, pp. 177-182spa
dc.relation.referencesBrix, H. (1993). Macrophyte-mediated oxygen transfer in wetlands: transport mechanisms and rates. In: Moshiri, G. A. (ed.) Constructed wetlands for water quality improvement, CRC Press, Boca Ratón, FL, pp. 391-398.spa
dc.relation.referencesBrix, H. (1994). “Use of constructed wetlands in water pol-lution control: historical development, present status, and future perspectives”. Water Science and Technology,vol. 30, No. 8, pp. 209-223spa
dc.relation.referencesColombia. MADVT (2004). Ministerio del Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial. La infancia, el agua y el saneamiento básico en los planes de desarrollo departamentales y municipales. Informe Panorama Nacional, Calidad del Agua.spa
dc.relation.referencesCharacklis, W. G and Marshall, K. C. (1990). Biofilms, Wiley-Interscience and John Wiley and Sons, New York.spa
dc.relation.referencesDangcong, P.; Bernet, N.; Delgenes, J. P. and Moletta, R. (2000). “Effect of oxygen supply methods on the perfor-mance of a sequencing batch reactor for ammonium nitrification”. Water Environment Research, vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 195-200.spa
dc.relation.referencesDavison, L.; Headley, T. and Pratt, K. (2005). “Aspects of design, structure, performance and operation of reed beds-eight years experience in northeastern New South Wales, Australia”. Water Science and Technology, vol. 51, No. 10, pp. 129-138.spa
dc.relation.referencesGarcía, J.; Rousseau, D. P. L.; Morató, J.; Lesage, E.; Matamoros, V. and Bayona, J. M. (2010). “Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: a review”. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 40, No. 7 (July), pp. 561-661spa
dc.relation.referencesHench, K. R.; Bissonnette, G. K.; Sexstone, A. J.; Coleman, J. G.; Garbutt, K. and Skousen, J. G. (2003). Fate of physical, chemical, and microbial contaminants in domestic wastewater following treatment by small constructed wetlands”. Water Research, vol. 37, No. 4, pp. 921-927.spa
dc.relation.referencesKadlec, R.H and Knight, R.L. (1996). Treatment wetlands.CRC Press, Florida, 893 pp.spa
dc.relation.referencesKadlec, R. H.; Knight, R. L.; Vyamazal, J.; Brix, H.; Cooper, P. and Haberl, R. (2000). Constructed wetlands for water pollution control processes, performance, design and op-eration. IWA Specialist Group on Use of Macrophytes in Water Pollution Control, Scientific and Technical Report No, 8. IWA Publishing.spa
dc.relation.referencesKemp, M. C. and George, D. B. (1997). Subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating municipal wastewater for nitrogen transformation and removal. Water Environ-ment Research, vol. 69, No. 7, pp. 1254-1262.spa
dc.relation.referencesKim, S. Y. and Geary, P. M. (2001). The impact of biomass har-vesting on phosphorus uptake by wetland plants”. Water Science and Technology, vol. 44, No. 11-12, pp. 61-67.spa
dc.relation.referencesKnight, R, L.; Ruble, R. W.; Kadlec, R. H. and Reed, S. C. (1993). Database North American wetlands for water quality treatment, Phase II Report, prepared for USEPA. September.spa
dc.relation.referencesKowalik, P. and Obarska-Pempkowiak, H. Poland. In: Vymazal, J.; Brix, H., Cooper, P. F.; Green, M. B. andHaberl, R. (eds.). Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in Europe. Leiden, The Netherlands: Back-huys, 1998. pp. 217-225spa
dc.relation.referencesLeyva, P. (2001). El medio ambiente en Colombia: el agua. Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Am-bientales, IDEAM. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente. República de Colombia. 530 p.spa
dc.relation.referencesMantovi, P.; Marmiroli, M.; Maestri, E.; Tagliavini; Piccinini, S. and Marmiroli, N. (2003). Application of a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland on treatment of dairy parlor wastewater, Bioresource Technology, vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 85-94.spa
dc.relation.referencesMasbough, A.; Frankowski, K.; Hall, K. and Duff, S. (2005). “The effectiveness of constructed wetland for treatment of wood waste leachat”. Ecological Engineering, vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 552-566.spa
dc.relation.referencesMetcalf & Eddy Inc. Wastewater engineering: Treatment and reuse, 3rd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, 1991.spa
dc.relation.referencesNakamura, K.; Miki, O. and Shimatani, Y. (2000). Compact wetland system for urban area in Japan. 7th International Conference on Wetland System for Water Pollution Control, vol 2, pp. 963-969. Lake Buena Vista, FL (11-16 November).spa
dc.relation.referencesNguyen, L. M. (1999). “Organic matter composition, microbial mass and microbial activity in gravel-bed constructed wetlands treating farm dairy wastewaters”. Ecological Engineering, vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 199-221.spa
dc.relation.referencesSánchez, N. E. (2007). Estandarización de las condiciones que influyen en el tratamiento de agua residual do-méstica utilizando la técnica de humedales artificiales. Tesis (Ingeniería Ambiental), Universidad del Cauca, Popayán.spa
dc.relation.referencesSong, Z.; Bi, X. and Cao, J. (2002). “Application of constructed wetlands in sewage treatment in small cities in China”. Chinese Journal of Ecology, vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 74-78spa
dc.relation.referencesStott, R. and Tanner, C. (2005). “Influence of biofilm on removal of surrogate faecal microbes in a constructed wetland and maturation pond”. Water Science and Technology, vol. 51, No. 9, pp. 315-22.spa
dc.relation.referencesTanner, C. C. (2000). Plants as ecosystem engineers in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands. Proceedings of the International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, vol. 1, pp. 13-22. Lake Buena Vista, FL (11-16 November).spa
dc.relation.referencesUSEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agen-cy) (1993a). Subsurface flow constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. A technology assessment, EPA/832/R-93/008, USEPA Office of Water. Washington, D. Cspa
dc.relation.referencesUSEPA (1993b). Guidance for design and construction of a subsurface flow constructed wetland. USEPA, Region 6, Water Management Division, Municipal Facilities Branch, Technical Section.spa
dc.relation.referencesUSEPA (2000). Constructed wetlands treatment of municipal wastewaters. EPA/625/R-99/010. United States Envi-ronmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH, 165 pspa
dc.relation.referencesVymazal, J. .Types of constructed wetlands for wasterwa-ter treatment: their potential for nutrient removal, In: Vymazal, J. (ed.). Transformations of nutrients in natu-ral and constructed wetlands. Leiden, The Netherlands: Backhuys, 2001. pp. 1-93.spa
dc.relation.referencesVymazal, J.; Greenway, M.; Tonderski, K.; Brix, H and Mander, Ü. (2006). “Constructed wetlands for waste-water treatment”.Wetlands and Natural Resource Management, vol. 190, Section II, pp. 69-96spa
dc.relation.referencesWetzel, R. G. (2001). “Fundamental processes within natu-ral and constructed wetlands ecosystems: short-term objectives”. Water Science and Technology, vol. 44, No. 11-12, pp.1-8spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessspa
dc.subject.decsDemanda Bioquímica de Oxígeno
dc.subject.decsAgua Residual
dc.subject.decsWaste Water
dc.subject.decsÁguas Residuárias
dc.subject.decsEffluents Domestiques
dc.subject.decsMacrófitas
dc.subject.decsMacrophytes
dc.subject.decsMateria orgánica
dc.subject.decsOrganic matter
dc.subject.decsMatière organique
dc.subject.proposalHumedal construido
dc.subject.proposalConstructed wetland;
dc.subject.proposalBanhado construído
dc.title.translatedComparative study of the organic matter removal in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands using three species of macrophytes
dc.title.translatedEstudo comparativo da remoção de matéria orgânica em banhados construídos de fluxo horizontal subsuperficial usando tres espécies de macrófitas
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1spa
dc.type.contentTextspa
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlespa
dc.type.redcolhttp://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionspa
dc.type.coarversionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85spa
dc.rights.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2spa


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre:
Estudio comparativo de la remoción ...
Tamaño:
861.6Kb
Formato:
PDF
Ver/

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/